Evidence & Proof, Jeff Spender is
Criminal SCUM
Australian Federal Court Judge Jeffrey Ernest John Spender is criminal scum.  This site has the IRREFUTABLE CONCLUSIVE Evidence & Proof of the Criminal Fraud and CONSPIRACY to DEFRAUD, of a DISABLED LAD by this labor appointed Federal Court Judge Jeffrey Spender.  HEAR Audio to FAT PARASITE Spender

How many other fraudsters has Jeffrey Spender assisted when they have opposed HONEST PEOPLE in the Federal Court?

Reg. Office: 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, Qld. 4067, Australia.
Editor-in-Chief:  Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA      E-Contact us:

Australian Federal Court Judge Jeffrey Ernest John Spender is criminal scum.  This site has the IRREFUTABLE CONCLUSIVE Evidence & Proof of the Criminal Fraud by this labor appointed Federal Court Judge Jeffrey Spender.

MENU: Rantala-Gate: Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia.

Today's HAIG HOT_TOPICS

•  HUNG PARLIAMENT SPECIAL:  bye-election in DICKSON: Peter Dutton FRAUD  READ ALL ABOUT IT

•  LAWYERS Stephen Tonge & Flower & Hart LAND FRAUD & Armed Robbery

•  Armed Robbery & Egregious Magistrate Walter Ehrich then Stephen Tonge's Fraud  for Rev John Morgan

• OPEN LETTER: 2010/08/09 Chief Justice Paul de Jersey EXPOSE the Anglican FRAUD!!
  

•  OPEN LETTER: 2010/08/05 Stephen John Tonge, Flower & Hart, & Tress Cox re Stephen Tonge FRAUD:
  

•  Who is Lawyer Stephen Tonge & How Did He Defraud Me?
  

•  OPEN LETTER: 2010/08/05 Stephen John Tonge, Flower & Hart, & Tress Cox re Stephen Tonge FRAUD
  

•  Flower & Hart [F&H] Land Fraud & Armed Robbery
  

•   Federal Election SPECIAL: Qld Court of Appeal exposes LNP FRAUD;

•  Federal Election SPECIAL: LNP FRAUD: Peter Dutton in Dickson CORRUPTION
  

•  LNP CORRUPTION: Brisbane LordMayor Campbell Newman:
  

•  Qld Court of Appeal exposes LNP Brisbane LordMayor Campbell Newman FRAUD
  

• Qld's Court of Appeal Exposes Egregious conduct by Brisbane Magistrate
  

• The topsy-turvy "Alice in Wonderland" Magistrate  CLICK HERE
  

•   Power to the people:  NOW, you can FIGHT BACK against public sector parasites, and they CAN'T TOUCH YOU. Take Control of your own destiny:
  

• Qld POLICE: ASSAULT & KIDNAP of FEDERAL ELECTION CANDIDATE
  

•  Qld's Court of Appeal ON TRIAL: Delivers a GLORIOUS DECISION

• Fraud by Corrupt Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church

•  Qld Chief Justice Paul de Jersey CORRUPTION CONNECTION
  

• HOT VIDEOS:   Police Brutality videos:  Queensland  & Australian 
  

• Hear Bare Fist Fighter Jim Tierney Challenge to Maggot cop Michael Anthony O'Sullivan to fight him in the RING
• See the EVIDENCE: Corrupt LAWYERS: Are John W Peden and Ms V Prasley CORRUPT??
  
• OPEN LETTER to the Pontiff, Pope Benedict: RETURN the GYM EQUIPMENT stolen in Cairns by ROMAN CATHOLIC, St Vincent de Paul
• See Stat Dec re CORRUPT POLICE, by Respected Law Lecturer  Dr Christine Eastwood
  

• Index: Evidence & Proof of Criminal Fraud by Federal Court labor Judge Jeffrey Spender
•     The Conclusive Irrefutable PROOF to CONVICT & IMPRISON JEFFREY SPENDER
•     As a barrister, SPENDER cheated his SEVERELY DISABLED client
•     Spender CONSPIRED with PERJURING Criminal 'INSTRUCTING' solicitor Mellifont
•     The FACTS PROVEN by this EVIDENCE
•     The Reason this is so serious
•     The two day charade & Spender's act
  
•     What Benefit Spender got out of the charade
•     How ONLY but ALL, not just some, HONEST people are harmed
•     INTERNATIONAL RAMIFICATIONS of DECADES of Australian FRAUD
•     Culpability of the Queensland Law Society Incorporated corruption  
•     Culpability of Supeme Court of Queensland
•     ARE ALL Lawyers corrupt?  How many will act for thier clients and refuse to have Spender hear their matter?
•     More about this Jeffrey Spender parasite
•     Federal Court so Spender PARASITE on Australian Taxpayer
•     How about his parasite wife Glenice Spender?  Parasite on the Queensland Taxpayer
•     Spender's PUBLIC BUNKUM that he cares for the disabled
•     How Spender has CORRUPTED THE QUEENSLAND REGISTRY of the Federal Court
•     What Spender and Mellifont have done to me, since

My transcription of my letter to J. T. Munro, dated 12th May, 1975.

My transcription of my letter to J. T. Munro, dated 12th May, 1975.

18th June, 1974 was a Tuesday.
14th June, 1974 was a Friday.

6 Charles Street,
Gulliver,
Townsville, Q.4812.
12th May, 1975.

Mr. J. T. Munro,
Taxing Officer,
Registry,
Supreme Court,
Brisbane.

Sir,
In the matter of the Costs Act of 1867
and
In the Matter of T.J. Mellifont & Co's.
Bill of Costs v. Russell G.H. Mathews

And Taxation in your
office Friday, 9th May,
last at 11am.

I wish to appeal against the decision to allow Item 42 with a cost of $63.00.

I feel Mr Mellifont has not justified this charge and am sure he cannot prove that any work pertaining to this item was done which has not already been costed in the itemised Bill of Costs.

Regarding "instructions to brief"; I bring to your attention items 31, 32 and 33 amongst others.  Regarding "all attendances and perusals not herein specified"; I suggest there were none?   After all, this is an itemised Bill of Costs, so if Mr Mellifont contends any existed why did he not itemise them?

Regarding "general care and consideration":-  I firmly believe Mr. Mellifont gave my case little or no consideration apart from when I interviewed him and when he drew and received correspondence and received 'phone calls and the other items for each of which he has charged in the itemised Bill of Costs.  In fact, one minor point, was considered and costed twice, I believe; refer items 24 and 26.   Besides feeling that Mr. Mellifont did not exercise unspecified "general care and consideration", I feel he exercised less than the minimum required by prudence.   I am convinced he had forgotten to take my statement until I had just begun to speak to the barrister who appeared for me in this appeal to the Railway Appeals Tribunal, Mr. J.E.J. Spender.  I believe the time was then that "the penny dropped", when Mr Mellifont asked me, "I haven't got a statement from you yet, have I?"  Upon my answering that he had not, he then said that my statement would be taken and then to continue the interview with Mr. Spender when my statement had been taken.

Sir, I feel that in the absence of proof from Mr. Mellifont to support this charge of $63.00, it should be disallowed.

Yours faithfully,

signed: Russell G. H. Mathews

Russell G.H. Mathews.

  This site is still under construction.  In the  Interim, I refer you to theEVIDENCE of the Bill of Costs prepared by Terry Mellifont [including all the actions he should have undertaken - for which he had charged, so not doubt it would be on the record - but which he  had to admit he had not done] [441Kb] plus a letter I wrote, dated 12th May, 1975,  to the Taxing officer of the Supreme Court of Queensland, named JT Munro, and also my transcription - for easier reading by you - and which is accurate.  I have substantial other material on my many website regarding Mellifont and Spender.  I have a Directory of mentions of TJ Mellifont and Directory of mentions of JEJ Spender. 
 

.